ISSN: 2573-4555

Traditionelle Medizin und klinische Naturheilkunde

Offener Zugang

Unsere Gruppe organisiert über 3000 globale Konferenzreihen Jährliche Veranstaltungen in den USA, Europa und anderen Ländern. Asien mit Unterstützung von 1000 weiteren wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaften und veröffentlicht über 700 Open Access Zeitschriften, die über 50.000 bedeutende Persönlichkeiten und renommierte Wissenschaftler als Redaktionsmitglieder enthalten.

Open-Access-Zeitschriften gewinnen mehr Leser und Zitierungen
700 Zeitschriften und 15.000.000 Leser Jede Zeitschrift erhält mehr als 25.000 Leser

Indiziert in
  • CAS-Quellenindex (CASSI)
  • Google Scholar
  • Sherpa Romeo
  • Öffnen Sie das J-Tor
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • RefSeek
  • Verzeichnis der Indexierung von Forschungszeitschriften (DRJI)
  • Hamdard-Universität
  • EBSCO AZ
  • Publons
  • Genfer Stiftung für medizinische Ausbildung und Forschung
  • Euro-Pub
  • ICMJE
Teile diese Seite

Abstrakt

Antibacterial Properties of Ethanolic Extracts of Propolis collected from Southwest Ethiopia

Getahun Befirdu Abza, Jemal Hussien Ahmed, Getahun Paulos, Kothai Seshathri

Background: The effectiveness of antimicrobial drugs becomes uncertain due to the emergence of multidrug resistant microorganisms, which highlights the need for alternative antibacterial agents. Natural products are of great importance in the search for biologically active compounds.

Aim of Study: The present study aimed at investigating the antibacterial properties of propolis, one of the bee products, against S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and E. coli.

Materials and methods: Propolis was extracted using 30%, 50%, 70%, and 99.9% ethanol. The in vitro antibacterial activity of crude propolis extracts was evaluated by the disc diffusion method with concentrations between 500 and 4000 μg/ml.

Results: Among all ethanol extracts, the 50% and 70% propolis extracts showed strong antibacterial activity against all tested strains with inhibition zones ranging from 6.64 ± 0.15 to 11.99 ± 0.04 mm. P. aeruginosa was sensitive strain to the ethanolic extract of propolis with the highest inhibition zone diameter of 11.99 ± 0.04 mm. Statistically significant difference in growth inhibition was observed among the types of extracts (30%, 50%, 70% and 99.9%) against P. aeruginosa (p<0.05) and E. coli (p<0.05), but the effect was not significant against S. aureus (p>0.05). All propolis extracts showed no effect on S. aureus at concentrations below 2000 μg/ml. Propolis extracts showed a lower zone of inhibition compared to the effect demonstrated by the positive control.

Conclusion: The present study verifies the antibacterial potential of Ethiopian propolis which could be of clinical benefit.