ISSN: 2161-0711

Gemeinschaftsmedizin und Gesundheitserziehung

Offener Zugang

Unsere Gruppe organisiert über 3000 globale Konferenzreihen Jährliche Veranstaltungen in den USA, Europa und anderen Ländern. Asien mit Unterstützung von 1000 weiteren wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaften und veröffentlicht über 700 Open Access Zeitschriften, die über 50.000 bedeutende Persönlichkeiten und renommierte Wissenschaftler als Redaktionsmitglieder enthalten.

Open-Access-Zeitschriften gewinnen mehr Leser und Zitierungen
700 Zeitschriften und 15.000.000 Leser Jede Zeitschrift erhält mehr als 25.000 Leser

Abstrakt

Associations between Healthcare Trust, Health Information Trust, and Barriers to Colorectal and Cervical Cancer Screening

Jayme Wood, Alain Kameni

Objective: Trust in the healthcare system and health information is an important determining factor for patient healthcare utilization. This study examines the relationships among healthcare trust, health information trust, and barriers to screening, and their association with receipt of cervical and colorectal cancer screening.
Methods: Women aged 45 years-65 years in central Pennsylvania completed a survey about cancer screening (n=474). We used chi square tests, bivariate and multivariable logistic regression, and moderation analysis to examine associations among healthcare trust, health information trust, barriers to screening, and being up to date with cervical cancer screening and with colorectal cancer screening.
Results: On average, participants were 55.1 years old. Being up to date with cervical and colorectal cancer screening was more common in participants with private insurance and those who had a check-up within the last year (all p<0.05). Cervical cancer screening was higher for participants with greater health information trust and fewer barriers (both p<0.05). Colorectal cancer screening was higher for participants with fewer barriers to screening (multivariable odds ratio [OR]=0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.35-0.82). There was no evidence of an interaction between barriers to screening and healthcare trust or health information trust with cervical cancer screening (p=0.70 and p=0.07, respectively) or colorectal cancer screening (p=0.59 andp=0.93, respectively).
Conclusion: Measures of trust did not moderate the relationship between barriers to screening and screening uptake, suggesting that interventions may directly impact screening behaviors by targeting either trust or barriers. The findings of this study can guide future interventions to promote cervical and colorectal cancer screening uptake.