ISSN: 2155-6199

Zeitschrift für Bioremediation und biologischen Abbau

Offener Zugang

Unsere Gruppe organisiert über 3000 globale Konferenzreihen Jährliche Veranstaltungen in den USA, Europa und anderen Ländern. Asien mit Unterstützung von 1000 weiteren wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaften und veröffentlicht über 700 Open Access Zeitschriften, die über 50.000 bedeutende Persönlichkeiten und renommierte Wissenschaftler als Redaktionsmitglieder enthalten.

Open-Access-Zeitschriften gewinnen mehr Leser und Zitierungen
700 Zeitschriften und 15.000.000 Leser Jede Zeitschrift erhält mehr als 25.000 Leser

Indiziert in
  • CAS-Quellenindex (CASSI)
  • Index Copernicus
  • Google Scholar
  • Sherpa Romeo
  • Öffnen Sie das J-Tor
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Akademische Schlüssel
  • JournalTOCs
  • Forschungsbibel
  • Nationale Wissensinfrastruktur Chinas (CNKI)
  • Ulrichs Zeitschriftenverzeichnis
  • Zugang zu globaler Online-Forschung in der Landwirtschaft (AGORA)
  • RefSeek
  • Hamdard-Universität
  • EBSCO AZ
  • OCLC – WorldCat
  • SWB Online-Katalog
  • Publons
  • Genfer Stiftung für medizinische Ausbildung und Forschung
  • MIAR
  • ICMJE
Teile diese Seite

Abstrakt

Critical Analysis of Two Respirometric Methods for Solid Substrates Based On Continuous and Semi-Continuous Aeration

Rada EC, Ragazzi M and Venturi M

In the sector of respirometry applied to solid waste many tools are available. Moreover, methods for assessing the oxygen consumption can be significantly different. In Italy, the sector is characterized by the adoption of dynamic approaches that are preferred to the static ones. In this paper, a comparison between the two respirometers more adopted in Italy is presented. The first one is the Costech respirometer, with continuous aeration and without temperature control. The second one is the AIR-nl respirometer, with temperature control and a semicontinuous aeration based on the principle of avoiding limiting conditions of oxygen. Results were obtained during an experimental research that involved on one hand the construction of an analytical model for evaluating the Respirometric Index (RI) for various substrates and on the other, the critical analysis of the obtained measurements. In this paper, the relationship between the output of tests conducted in parallel with two different instruments on the same samples is analyzed. Some differences between the results of the measurements and obtainable parameters (RI24) are underlined. Considerations on reference moisture, temperature role, and respirometric index calculation method allow the understanding of the characteristics of the two methods in more detail.