ISSN: 2155-6105

Zeitschrift für Suchtforschung und -therapie

Offener Zugang

Unsere Gruppe organisiert über 3000 globale Konferenzreihen Jährliche Veranstaltungen in den USA, Europa und anderen Ländern. Asien mit Unterstützung von 1000 weiteren wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaften und veröffentlicht über 700 Open Access Zeitschriften, die über 50.000 bedeutende Persönlichkeiten und renommierte Wissenschaftler als Redaktionsmitglieder enthalten.

Open-Access-Zeitschriften gewinnen mehr Leser und Zitierungen
700 Zeitschriften und 15.000.000 Leser Jede Zeitschrift erhält mehr als 25.000 Leser

Indiziert in
  • CAS-Quellenindex (CASSI)
  • Index Copernicus
  • Google Scholar
  • Sherpa Romeo
  • Öffnen Sie das J-Tor
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Akademische Schlüssel
  • JournalTOCs
  • SafetyLit
  • Nationale Wissensinfrastruktur Chinas (CNKI)
  • Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek
  • RefSeek
  • Hamdard-Universität
  • EBSCO AZ
  • OCLC – WorldCat
  • SWB Online-Katalog
  • Virtuelle Bibliothek für Biologie (vifabio)
  • Publons
  • Genfer Stiftung für medizinische Ausbildung und Forschung
  • Euro-Pub
  • ICMJE
Teile diese Seite

Abstrakt

Peer Support for Opioid Use Disorders: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Moderated Text-Based Group Chat Application

Caroline R. Scherzer, Megan L. Ranney, John Patena, Ernestine Jennings, Kirsten J. Langdon, Francesca L. Beaudoin , Francesca L. Beaudoin

Purpose: To elucidate key elements surrounding acceptability/feasibility, usability, and features of a smartphone-based mobile peer support application for adults engaged in treatment for opioid use disorder.

Methods: We recruited adults engaged in treatment for opioid use disorder, during the course of usual care, at a hospital-affiliated outpatient clinic. Participants piloted a smartphone-based mobile peer support application for six weeks and completed semi-structured interviews exploring usability and acceptability of the mobile platform. Interviews were conducted by trained interviewers, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. A coding structure was iteratively developed using Framework Analysis focusing on feasibility and acceptability of the app and recommendations for improvement.

Results: Saturation was reached after 20 interviews (mean age 43.1; 60% white; 15% Hispanic/Latinx; 55% late in recovery; 55% high engagement users). Qualitatively, participants articulated (1) Acceptability/feasibility themes: benefits, challenges, feature recommendations; and (2) Emergent themes: support and alternative treatment option. Quantitative measures indicated feasibility with a total of 2,436 messages sent over the study period.

Conclusion: Adults engaged in medication for opioid use disorder expressed high degree of user satisfaction about a smartphone-based mobile peer support application. Incorporating thematic results on participants’ experiences and interactions with the peer support application and the application’s role in recovery efforts can inform development of future mobile-peer support applications for adults engaged in medication for opioid use disorder. Concerns about activity in peer support groups may be addressed through structured support from a moderator or designatedtimeframes to go online.