ISSN: 2157-2526

Zeitschrift für Bioterrorismus und Bioverteidigung

Offener Zugang

Unsere Gruppe organisiert über 3000 globale Konferenzreihen Jährliche Veranstaltungen in den USA, Europa und anderen Ländern. Asien mit Unterstützung von 1000 weiteren wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaften und veröffentlicht über 700 Open Access Zeitschriften, die über 50.000 bedeutende Persönlichkeiten und renommierte Wissenschaftler als Redaktionsmitglieder enthalten.

Open-Access-Zeitschriften gewinnen mehr Leser und Zitierungen
700 Zeitschriften und 15.000.000 Leser Jede Zeitschrift erhält mehr als 25.000 Leser

Indiziert in
  • CAS-Quellenindex (CASSI)
  • Index Copernicus
  • Google Scholar
  • Sherpa Romeo
  • Öffnen Sie das J-Tor
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Akademische Schlüssel
  • JournalTOCs
  • Forschungsbibel
  • Nationale Wissensinfrastruktur Chinas (CNKI)
  • Ulrichs Zeitschriftenverzeichnis
  • RefSeek
  • Hamdard-Universität
  • EBSCO AZ
  • OCLC – WorldCat
  • SWB Online-Katalog
  • Publons
  • Genfer Stiftung für medizinische Ausbildung und Forschung
  • Euro-Pub
  • ICMJE
Teile diese Seite

Abstrakt

Predicting Radiation Doses Based on Time to Emesis in Nuclear Terrorism

Zubin Hilton

The standard mistake, certainty span, explicitness and awareness, and Collector Working Trademark bend are utilized to describe the vulnerability of the portion forecast. Using data on time to emesis, the dose prediction has a relative error of about 200%. Therefore, the 95% confidence interval is approximately if D is the dose assessment. In the event of a nuclear terrorism incident, our evaluation of the precision is used to calculate the probabilities for medical triage and management. A lack of consideration for individuals who do not vomit, differences between the conditions under which the data were obtained and the conditions under which they are likely to be used, and the potential for the incidence of vomiting to be altered by factors unrelated to radiation exposure such as psychogenic factors and the use of emetic agents are additional indicators that the utilization of time to emesis for triage presents additional challenges. In conclusion, while the time to emesis method is quick and inexpensive for estimating radiation dose, it should be used with caution due to its imprecision and the possibility of a high rate of false positives. More solid strategies for some time later appraisal of radiation portion are expected to supplement the utilization of time to emesis.