Unsere Gruppe organisiert über 3000 globale Konferenzreihen Jährliche Veranstaltungen in den USA, Europa und anderen Ländern. Asien mit Unterstützung von 1000 weiteren wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaften und veröffentlicht über 700 Open Access Zeitschriften, die über 50.000 bedeutende Persönlichkeiten und renommierte Wissenschaftler als Redaktionsmitglieder enthalten.

Open-Access-Zeitschriften gewinnen mehr Leser und Zitierungen
700 Zeitschriften und 15.000.000 Leser Jede Zeitschrift erhält mehr als 25.000 Leser

Abstrakt

A Social Return on Investment Analysis of the Healthy Weights Initiative: 12-month Results for 1,401 Participants.

Lemstra ME and Rogers M

The Healthy Weights Initiative (HWI) is a free, complete stoutness decrease program inside two urban communities in the territory of Saskatchewan, Canada. The goal of the investigation was to direct a Social Return On Investment (SROI) examination on the HWI, which assesses the general monetary, social, and ecological estimation of an intercession. There are six phases to a SROI: 1) distinguish partners; 2) map intercession changes including information sources, yields, and results; 3) give results a money related intermediary; 4) represent different variables that can clarify the result and alter for drop-off; 5) figure the SROI; and 6) report the outcomes to a wide populace. From June 1, 2015 to January 31, 2018, 2,000 members finished the underlying 24-week HWI program. As of December 31, 2018, 1,401 HWI members (70.0%) consented to one-year development and the SROI overview. The review was additionally finished by 121 of 132 alluding doctors (91.7%). Generally speaking, 99.9% of HWI members accepted the watched results were worthy, 7.1% accepted the outcomes were perhaps because of another program in the city, 99.8% felt the program merited the cost, 71.3% demonstrated they would pay for such a program themselves, and 99% trusted some degree of government should back the program. Among alluding doctors, 98.3% accepted the watched results were adequate, 10.7% accepted the outcomes were perhaps because of another program in the city, 96.7% felt the program merited the cost, 53.7% demonstrated they would pay for such a program themselves, and 82.6% trusted some degree of government should back the program.